Source & Citation Standards
Remodeling List commits to providing accurate and reliable information for all home improvement projects. Our editorial team upholds clear standards for source material and citations. This ensures readers receive trustworthy advice for their remodeling tasks.
Authoritative Sources
We rely on sources recognized for accuracy and expertise in home improvement, construction, and related fields. These include government agencies such as the EPA or local building code authorities. We also consult academic research, reputable industry associations like the National Association of Home Builders, and established product manufacturers’ specifications.
Citation Format
Our articles provide direct hyperlinks to source material whenever possible. This allows readers to easily access and review the original information. We embed these links contextually within the relevant text. Our goal is a clear and simple citation style for everyone.
Source Verification
Before publishing, our editorial staff verifies all included sources. This process involves checking the author’s credentials and the publication’s reputation. We also assess the date of the material to ensure its currency and relevance to modern remodeling practices. Cross-referencing information with other trusted sources confirms accuracy.
Anonymous Sources
Remodeling List strongly prefers named and identifiable sources. We use anonymous or unnamed sources only under rare, specific circumstances. Such instances require review and approval from senior editors. The information must be verifiable through alternative, confirmed means.
Primary Over Secondary Sources
We prioritize primary sources whenever possible. This includes original research, official government reports, and direct manufacturer installation guides for building materials. Secondary sources, like news articles or analyses, provide context or further explanation. We ensure these secondary sources accurately represent the primary data.
Reader Verification
Readers can verify our cited sources by clicking the provided hyperlinks within articles. Each link directs to the original content for review. If you have questions about a source or its information, please contact our team.
Handling Disputed Sources
We welcome feedback on our content. If a reader disputes the accuracy or validity of a source, please email [email protected]. Our editorial team will investigate the claim within 48 business hours. We will re-evaluate the source and make any necessary corrections or updates to the article. A typical resolution timeline is within 5 business days.
Last Updated: March 2026